Glossary · Concepts

RPA vs agentic automation

RPA follows brittle, hand-recorded scripts; agentic automation has a model plan against the live page — then compiles the result so it can replay cheaply.

What is rpa vs agentic automation?

Robotic process automation (RPA) executes pre-recorded, rule-based scripts tied to specific UI coordinates or selectors, which break when a page changes. Agentic automation uses a language model to perceive the page and plan actions toward a goal, adapting to layout changes. Twin’s model compiles a successful agentic run into a skill, so you get RPA-like cheap repeatability without RPA-like brittleness.

Why it matters

Pure RPA is cheap to run but expensive to maintain; pure agentic automation adapts but pays the model every run. Compile-once-then-replay is the synthesis: a model figures the flow out, and a deterministic skill runs it — the wedge for teams replacing legacy RPA.

See it in context: read how Twin compiles and replays a run, follow the cost-cutting guide, or browse use cases and comparisons.

Run your first skill

Give an LLM agent a real browser, compile the workflow once, and watch the marginal cost fall as the cache takes over.